Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,716,751 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 98.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $47,394, a difference of 17.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $97,880, a difference of 14.4%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $57,352, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $41,527, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.64%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.1%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.94%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).