Immigrants from Ukraine vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,150,950 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Ukraine communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ukraine within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ukraine corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,447 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,664 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.9%), and median male earnings ($59,820 compared to $57,352, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($109,645 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.75%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and per capita income ($48,134 compared to $47,394, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.8%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.0%).