Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,463,347 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $97,880, a difference of 30.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $89,496, a difference of 24.6%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $57,352, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.76%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $63,643, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,914, a difference of 19.6%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $56,709 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,067 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $111,519 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,433 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $70,146 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,818 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $62,083 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,140 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $127,500 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,567 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.5% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.2% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.6% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.6% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Average 89.3% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.0% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.2% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |