Bolivian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,055,596 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Bolivian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bolivians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bolivians corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($74,245 compared to $63,643, a difference of 16.7%), median household income ($102,195 compared to $89,496, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,871 compared to $104,992, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,526 compared to $47,394, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($43,445 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.6%), and wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.6%), married-couple households (49.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (48.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.1%), master's degree (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.27%), college, 1 year or more (63.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.1%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.1%).