Portuguese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,232,425 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.0%), per capita income ($44,362 compared to $47,394, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,914, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $104,992, a difference of 0.30%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $89,496, a difference of 0.59%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $57,352, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households (65.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.4%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.7%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.6%).