Northern European vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,435,637 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.251% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 250.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,870 compared to $104,992, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,457 compared to $97,880, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,887 compared to $48,913, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.46%), and per capita income ($47,698 compared to $47,394, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.93%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.080%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.1%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and bachelor's degree (41.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%).