Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Good
Exceptional
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,426,085 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 141.8 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Scandinavian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.8%), median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $41,527, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($43,848 compared to $47,394, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $104,992, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $97,880, a difference of 2.4%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Good
25.3%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.95%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and female unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Excellent
30.3%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.6%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
6.0%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.4%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%