Japanese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,957,879 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $47,394, a difference of 18.9%), median family income ($97,288 compared to $108,830, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $57,352, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.87%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $97,880, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.1%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.52%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 79.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.3%).