Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,380,928 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $47,394, a difference of 39.7%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $108,830, a difference of 30.1%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $57,352, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $63,643, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 74.4%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.4%), and family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.5%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.27%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 99.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 97.7%), and no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 95.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).