Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,792,136 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.201% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 200.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $97,880, a difference of 6.8%), per capita income ($50,417 compared to $47,394, a difference of 6.4%), and median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $57,352, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $63,643, a difference of 0.75%), median household income ($92,225 compared to $89,496, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $104,992, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and single female poverty (18.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.63%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.7%), college, under 1 year (67.8% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and college, 1 year or more (62.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%).