Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,294,639 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 68.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Yup'ik Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $47,394, a difference of 55.3%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $57,352, a difference of 45.2%), and median family income ($79,290 compared to $108,830, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $63,643, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $51,914, a difference of 5.4%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Good
25.3%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 228.4%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 208.1%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 151.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 15.5%), single female poverty (26.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.9%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 259.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 234.5%), and male unemployment (16.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 232.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 83.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 85.4%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 140.0%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 86.0%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.1%), family households (72.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.7%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Excellent
30.3%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 365.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 59.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 54.3%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
6.0%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 119.3%), master's degree (8.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 104.0%), and associate's degree (25.0% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 102.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.34%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.65%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 275.6%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 97.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%