Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,874,158 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 45.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $47,394, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $57,352, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $97,880, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $63,643, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $41,527, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.97%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 31.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.0%).