Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,923,332 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 57.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $47,394, a difference of 26.7%), median family income ($90,918 compared to $108,830, a difference of 19.7%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $57,352, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.25%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $63,643, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 47.5%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.87%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 61.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%).