Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,861,228 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $47,394, a difference of 42.4%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $108,830, a difference of 34.5%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $89,496, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,914, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $63,643, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 88.4%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.1%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 68.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 62.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.0%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 41.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.3%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.2%).