Swedish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,057,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.586. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 21.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.1%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $41,527, a difference of 5.3%), and per capita income ($45,750 compared to $47,394, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.16%), median family income ($108,499 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.31%), and median household income ($88,524 compared to $89,496, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.81%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.47%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).