Fijian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,560,859 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $47,394, a difference of 29.2%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $57,352, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $108,830, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $63,643, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.9%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.28%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.57%), currently married (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 93.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 80.1%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%).