Scotch-Irish vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,682,602 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.244% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 244.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,563 compared to $32,345, a difference of 31.6%), median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $41,758, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $75,945, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $59,383, a difference of 0.11%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $44,003, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $31,489, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 49.4%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 47.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 6.2%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 126.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 126.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 125.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 41.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.78%), male disability (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%).