Taiwanese vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Arapaho
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,470,318 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.228% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 228.5 Arapaho.
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $32,345, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $71,697, a difference of 41.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $75,945, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $59,383, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $44,003, a difference of 13.2%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 101.4%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 67.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 18.5%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 213.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 160.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 151.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 77.1% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 62.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.6%), family households (63.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 47.1% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 32.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 77.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.52%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.2% |
Taiwanese vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 53.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 48.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Arapaho |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |