New Zealander vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Arapaho
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,751,289 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 27.9 Arapaho.
New Zealander vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $32,345, a difference of 56.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $71,697, a difference of 46.6%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $41,758, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $59,383, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $44,003, a difference of 21.1%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 23.5% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 66.7%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.0%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 165.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 154.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 141.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 77.1% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 55.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.7%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 12.9%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 47.1% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.2%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 29.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 114.7%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 107.1%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.2% |
New Zealander vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Arapaho |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |