French American Indian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,273,010 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 65.3 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $32,345, a difference of 24.4%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $41,758, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $71,697, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $44,003, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 46.6%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 37.5%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 0.92%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 106.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 105.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 28.7%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.6%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), disability (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.4%).