Scandinavian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Arapaho

Good
Fair
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,302,893 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 54.7 Arapaho.
Scandinavian Integration in Arapaho Communities

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $75,945, a difference of 35.6%), per capita income ($43,848 compared to $32,345, a difference of 35.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $71,697, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $59,383, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $44,003, a difference of 19.7%), and median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $31,489, a difference of 21.6%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricScandinavianArapaho
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
23.5%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 67.2%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 66.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 24.2%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianArapaho
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 155.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 148.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 144.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.9%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianArapaho
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.2%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 6.4%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
77.1%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 58.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.64, a difference of 15.8%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianArapaho
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
47.1%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
9.4%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.2%

Scandinavian vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.59%), female disability (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability (12.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.4%).
Scandinavian vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianArapaho
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%