Icelander vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Icelander
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Icelanders
Arapaho
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Icelander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,951,322 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.951. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.467% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 466.5 Arapaho.
Icelander vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $32,345, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $75,945, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $71,697, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $59,383, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $44,003, a difference of 16.5%), and wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $44,987 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,282 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,797 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,916 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,415 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,109 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,247 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,560 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,261 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,270 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 76.1%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 64.9%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.6%).
Poverty Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 177.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 143.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 142.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 77.1% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 55.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 12.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 47.1% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 23.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 75.9%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 66.5%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.5% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.2% |
Icelander vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.11%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Disability Metric | Icelander | Arapaho |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |