Macedonian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Macedonians

Arapaho

Excellent
Fair
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Macedonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,805,141 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Macedonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Macedonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Macedonians corresponds to an increase of 171.6 Arapaho.
Macedonian Integration in Arapaho Communities

Macedonian vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,573 compared to $32,345, a difference of 47.1%), median male earnings ($59,522 compared to $41,758, a difference of 42.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,882 compared to $71,697, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,564 compared to $59,383, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,563 compared to $44,003, a difference of 24.0%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricMacedonianArapaho
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,573
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,668
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,761
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,893
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,522
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,286
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,563
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,882
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,074
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,564
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
23.5%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 69.7%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 63.0%), and male poverty (9.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 22.0%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricMacedonianArapaho
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 165.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 137.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 134.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.6%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMacedonianArapaho
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.2%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMacedonianArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.8%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
77.1%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 69.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.9%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMacedonianArapaho
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
47.1%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 70.0%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 49.2%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMacedonianArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
9.4%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 67.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 65.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 7th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricMacedonianArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.8%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.2%

Macedonian vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 44.6%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.4%).
Macedonian vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricMacedonianArapaho
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%