Barbadian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,024,851 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.942. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.784% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 1,783.8 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,406 compared to $32,345, a difference of 31.1%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $31,489, a difference of 31.0%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $36,586, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $59,383, a difference of 9.6%), median family income ($93,919 compared to $82,064, a difference of 14.4%), and median household income ($79,664 compared to $67,965, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.1%), single father poverty (17.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 37.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.15%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 128.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 96.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 94.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.4%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 254.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 139.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 110.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 25.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 57.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 110.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.7%), female disability (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%).