Maltese vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,480,242 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.965. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 77.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $71,697, a difference of 53.5%), per capita income ($49,640 compared to $32,345, a difference of 53.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $75,945, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $59,383, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $44,003, a difference of 22.1%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 94.8%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 77.7%), and male poverty (9.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 175.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 145.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 134.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 69.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.6%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.64, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 40.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 76.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 75.2%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.6%).