Samoan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,196,478 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 113.3 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $75,945, a difference of 33.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,385 compared to $71,697, a difference of 28.9%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $67,965, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $59,383, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $31,489, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 88.2%), single father poverty (13.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 73.7%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 139.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 133.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 120.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 44.4%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.42 compared to 3.64, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.9%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.31%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.8%), bachelor's degree (31.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).