Immigrants from Fiji vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,840,922 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.924. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.241% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 1,241.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $71,697, a difference of 45.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $75,945, a difference of 40.8%), and median household income ($93,933 compared to $67,965, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $59,383, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $44,003, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 101.3%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 81.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 168.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 131.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 123.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 61.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.64, a difference of 5.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.55%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).