Comanche vs Arapaho In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Comanche
 Arapaho
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Comanche
Arapaho
82.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Arapaho In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,766,840 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 82.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,773,320 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Arapaho | 
| Minimum | 46.9% | 45.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 53.1% | 54.3% | 
| Mean | 83.1% | 77.7% | 
| Median | 83.6% | 76.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 78.5% | 70.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.5% | 85.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 15.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 13.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 13.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Arapaho by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Aleut (82.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Central America (82.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Hmong (82.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Hispanic or Latino (82.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ottawa (82.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Cherokee (81.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% | 
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |