Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,727,965 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.757. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.331% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 330.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,709 compared to $32,345, a difference of 28.9%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $31,489, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $71,697, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $59,383, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and median family income ($94,665 compared to $82,064, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 68.4%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 47.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 115.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 103.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 99.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 52.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.2%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (63.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 250.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 139.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 111.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 24.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 55.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 111.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.6%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 71.1%), disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.0%).