Tsimshian vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Arapaho
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 3,680,996 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 19.2 Arapaho.
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $71,697, a difference of 36.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $75,945, a difference of 27.4%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $31,489, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.0%), and median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,758, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 98.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 89.4%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 88.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.5%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 188.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 91.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 77.1% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.3%), currently married (47.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (67.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 47.1% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 51.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.2% |
Tsimshian vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 89.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 67.5%), and female disability (16.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |