Immigrants from Asia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,566,579 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $71,697, a difference of 54.5%), per capita income ($49,741 compared to $32,345, a difference of 53.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $75,945, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $59,383, a difference of 13.8%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $44,003, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 92.7%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 62.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 180.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 148.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 141.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 75.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.1%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.64, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 107.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 91.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and 10th grade (93.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 58.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.9%).