Thai vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,217,737 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $41,758, a difference of 72.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $75,945, a difference of 70.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $71,697, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $59,383, a difference of 21.4%), wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $44,003, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 104.0%), family poverty (6.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 89.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 87.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and single mother poverty (24.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 200.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 171.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 161.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 96.1%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.9%), and family households with children (30.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 137.0%), master's degree (21.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 117.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 75.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 62.9%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.7%).