Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,379,123 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $44,003, a difference of 16.9%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $32,345, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $75,945, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 4.5%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $82,064, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $59,383, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 59.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 120.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 114.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 69.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.9%).