Uruguayan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,671,666 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 91.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $32,345, a difference of 37.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $71,697, a difference of 30.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $75,945, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $59,383, a difference of 0.50%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $44,003, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 83.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 51.2%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 153.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 147.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 139.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 42.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 66.2%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 53.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.1%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 47.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.7%).