Native Hawaiian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,398,291 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 62.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $75,945, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $71,697, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $67,965, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $59,383, a difference of 19.6%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $31,489, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 73.9%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.4%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.0%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 133.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 116.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 116.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 37.3%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.64, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.30%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.5%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).