Hungarian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,756,291 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to a decrease of 31.1 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,426 compared to $32,345, a difference of 40.4%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $41,758, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $75,945, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $59,383, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $44,003, a difference of 14.2%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 59.2%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.9%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 11.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 143.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 127.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 50.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.64, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.3%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.4%).