Bermudan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,225,537 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.790% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 789.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,911 compared to $32,345, a difference of 32.7%), median male earnings ($52,465 compared to $41,758, a difference of 25.6%), and median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $31,489, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $44,003, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 67.2%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 121.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 120.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 119.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.3%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 73.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 66.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.1%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 54.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), female disability (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.3%).