Italian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,706,747 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,574 compared to $32,345, a difference of 47.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $71,697, a difference of 45.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $75,945, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $59,383, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $44,003, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 70.9%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 67.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 18.1%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 145.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 134.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 129.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 53.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.64, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 68.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 65.6%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.9%).