Indonesian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,029,786 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Indonesian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indonesians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indonesians corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,300 compared to $32,345, a difference of 15.3%), median female earnings ($36,140 compared to $31,489, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($41,701 compared to $36,586, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,566 compared to $44,003, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($72,856 compared to $67,965, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 55.6%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 150.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 147.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 147.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 34.6%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.52%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 57.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 44.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.28%), college, under 1 year (61.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and college, 1 year or more (55.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%).