Canadian vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Canadian
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Canadians
Arapaho
7,303
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
123rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,251,573 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Arapaho.
Canadian vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $32,345, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $75,945, a difference of 37.7%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $41,758, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $59,383, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $44,003, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 20.0%).
Income Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,858 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,597 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,769 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,911 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,286 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,724 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,336 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,625 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,560 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,230 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 64.5%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 54.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.3%).
Poverty Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.3% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 143.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 132.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 125.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.1% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Tragic 77.1% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 47.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 15.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.9% | Tragic 47.1% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.6%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.8% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.2% |
Canadian vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Canadian | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |