Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,386,060 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $41,758, a difference of 65.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $75,945, a difference of 63.5%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $32,345, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $59,383, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $44,003, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 100.9%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 75.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 188.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 163.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 153.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 90.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 36.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 125.3%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 107.2%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 105.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 70.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.3%).