Indian (Asian) vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,908,723 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $71,697, a difference of 66.7%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $32,345, a difference of 66.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $75,945, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.7%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $59,383, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $44,003, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 94.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 71.9%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 202.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 149.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 145.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 86.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.3%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 91.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 149.4%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 126.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 70.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.1%).