Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota

City Poverty vs State vs National
1. Ypsilanti 100.0% 10.8% (+89.2)#1 12.5% (+87.5)#102
2. Larson 100.0% 10.8% (+89.2)#2 12.5% (+87.5)#112
3. Hannah 72.7% 10.8% (+62.0)#3 12.5% (+60.2)#271
4. Luverne 63.6% 10.8% (+52.9)#4 12.5% (+51.1)#427
5. East Dunseith 61.2% 10.8% (+50.5)#5 12.5% (+48.7)#483
6. Pillsbury 55.6% 10.8% (+44.8)#6 12.5% (+43.0)#639
7. Mandaree 54.7% 10.8% (+44.0)#7 12.5% (+42.2)#674
8. Cannon Ball 54.5% 10.8% (+43.7)#8 12.5% (+41.9)#690
9. Hansboro 52.2% 10.8% (+41.4)#9 12.5% (+39.6)#788
10. Litchville 47.4% 10.8% (+36.6)#10 12.5% (+34.8)#1,066
11. East Fairview 46.2% 10.8% (+35.5)#11 12.5% (+33.7)#1,166
12. Springbrook 45.2% 10.8% (+34.4)#12 12.5% (+32.6)#1,241
13. Warwick 44.9% 10.8% (+34.1)#13 12.5% (+32.4)#1,257
14. Solen 43.2% 10.8% (+32.5)#14 12.5% (+30.7)#1,393
15. Fort Totten 41.7% 10.8% (+30.9)#15 12.5% (+29.1)#1,546
16. Loma 41.7% 10.8% (+30.9)#16 12.5% (+29.1)#1,548
17. Four Bears Village 41.4% 10.8% (+30.7)#17 12.5% (+28.9)#1,567
18. Ruthville 38.1% 10.8% (+27.4)#18 12.5% (+25.6)#1,890
19. Esmond 37.7% 10.8% (+27.0)#19 12.5% (+25.2)#1,948
20. Maxbass 36.7% 10.8% (+26.0)#20 12.5% (+24.2)#2,099
21. Upham 36.1% 10.8% (+25.3)#21 12.5% (+23.5)#2,184
22. De Lamere 35.0% 10.8% (+24.2)#22 12.5% (+22.5)#2,357
23. Bowdon 34.8% 10.8% (+24.1)#23 12.5% (+22.3)#2,380
24. Ryder 33.3% 10.8% (+22.6)#24 12.5% (+20.8)#2,658
25. Mchenry 32.8% 10.8% (+22.0)#25 12.5% (+20.2)#2,779
26. Amidon 32.3% 10.8% (+21.5)#26 12.5% (+19.7)#2,899
27. Maddock 32.2% 10.8% (+21.5)#27 12.5% (+19.7)#2,905
28. Fortuna 31.5% 10.8% (+20.7)#28 12.5% (+18.9)#3,086
29. Green Acres 30.6% 10.8% (+19.9)#29 12.5% (+18.1)#3,270
30. Fairdale 29.4% 10.8% (+18.6)#30 12.5% (+16.9)#3,557
31. Bathgate 29.2% 10.8% (+18.4)#31 12.5% (+16.6)#3,626
32. Parshall 28.9% 10.8% (+18.1)#32 12.5% (+16.4)#3,700
33. Edmore 28.7% 10.8% (+17.9)#33 12.5% (+16.1)#3,762
34. Pisek 28.6% 10.8% (+17.8)#34 12.5% (+16.0)#3,804
35. Bisbee 28.6% 10.8% (+17.8)#35 12.5% (+16.0)#3,808
36. York 28.6% 10.8% (+17.8)#36 12.5% (+16.0)#3,818
37. Fort Yates 27.8% 10.8% (+17.0)#37 12.5% (+15.2)#4,053
38. Sarles 27.8% 10.8% (+17.0)#38 12.5% (+15.2)#4,056
39. New Leipzig 27.7% 10.8% (+16.9)#39 12.5% (+15.1)#4,085
40. Ambrose 27.6% 10.8% (+16.8)#40 12.5% (+15.1)#4,118
41. Shell Valley 26.7% 10.8% (+15.9)#41 12.5% (+14.2)#4,408
42. Hamberg 26.7% 10.8% (+15.9)#42 12.5% (+14.1)#4,429
43. Belcourt 26.6% 10.8% (+15.9)#43 12.5% (+14.1)#4,441
44. Drake 26.6% 10.8% (+15.8)#44 12.5% (+14.1)#4,450
45. Verona 26.1% 10.8% (+15.3)#45 12.5% (+13.5)#4,651
46. Pettibone 24.6% 10.8% (+13.8)#46 12.5% (+12.1)#5,230
47. Lankin 24.3% 10.8% (+13.6)#47 12.5% (+11.8)#5,335
48. Haynes 23.7% 10.8% (+12.9)#48 12.5% (+11.1)#5,617
49. Center 23.1% 10.8% (+12.4)#49 12.5% (+10.6)#5,883
50. Mooreton 22.9% 10.8% (+12.2)#50 12.5% (+10.4)#5,993
51. Egeland 22.9% 10.8% (+12.1)#51 12.5% (+10.4)#6,006
52. Butte 22.5% 10.8% (+11.8)#52 12.5% (+10.0)#6,170
53. Devils Lake 22.4% 10.8% (+11.6)#53 12.5% (+9.82)#6,273
54. Leal 22.2% 10.8% (+11.5)#54 12.5% (+9.69)#6,356
55. Sheyenne 22.1% 10.8% (+11.3)#55 12.5% (+9.54)#6,417
56. Zeeland 21.9% 10.8% (+11.1)#56 12.5% (+9.34)#6,540
57. Ashley 21.3% 10.8% (+10.5)#57 12.5% (+8.72)#6,890
58. Hampden 20.7% 10.8% (+9.93)#58 12.5% (+8.15)#7,222
59. Walhalla 20.5% 10.8% (+9.70)#59 12.5% (+7.93)#7,360
60. Noonan 20.4% 10.8% (+9.66)#60 12.5% (+7.89)#7,386
61. New Town 20.4% 10.8% (+9.61)#61 12.5% (+7.84)#7,415
62. Medina 20.2% 10.8% (+9.39)#62 12.5% (+7.62)#7,554
63. Hazelton 20.1% 10.8% (+9.33)#63 12.5% (+7.56)#7,584
64. Hoople 20.1% 10.8% (+9.32)#64 12.5% (+7.55)#7,591
65. Elgin 20.0% 10.8% (+9.24)#65 12.5% (+7.47)#7,625
66. Ardoch 20.0% 10.8% (+9.24)#66 12.5% (+7.47)#7,642
67. Carson 19.8% 10.8% (+9.03)#67 12.5% (+7.26)#7,771
68. Dodge 19.8% 10.8% (+9.03)#68 12.5% (+7.26)#7,774
69. Grenora 19.8% 10.8% (+8.99)#69 12.5% (+7.22)#7,793
70. Halliday 19.6% 10.8% (+8.86)#70 12.5% (+7.09)#7,881
71. Scranton 19.5% 10.8% (+8.75)#71 12.5% (+6.98)#7,950
72. Kathryn 19.5% 10.8% (+8.75)#72 12.5% (+6.98)#7,951
73. Souris 19.3% 10.8% (+8.53)#73 12.5% (+6.76)#8,096
74. Glen Ullin 19.1% 10.8% (+8.29)#74 12.5% (+6.52)#8,248
75. Minto 18.9% 10.8% (+8.15)#75 12.5% (+6.38)#8,335
76. Gackle 18.5% 10.8% (+7.78)#76 12.5% (+6.01)#8,580
77. Hannaford 18.4% 10.8% (+7.63)#77 12.5% (+5.86)#8,699
78. Wahpeton 18.3% 10.8% (+7.50)#78 12.5% (+5.73)#8,793
79. Rolette 18.2% 10.8% (+7.48)#79 12.5% (+5.71)#8,814
80. Beach 18.1% 10.8% (+7.31)#80 12.5% (+5.54)#8,940
81. Lignite 18.0% 10.8% (+7.24)#81 12.5% (+5.47)#8,997
82. Coleharbor 18.0% 10.8% (+7.21)#82 12.5% (+5.44)#9,015
83. Selfridge 17.8% 10.8% (+7.04)#83 12.5% (+5.27)#9,148
84. Mott 17.7% 10.8% (+6.89)#84 12.5% (+5.12)#9,256
85. Nome 17.6% 10.8% (+6.88)#85 12.5% (+5.11)#9,269
86. Regent 17.4% 10.8% (+6.69)#86 12.5% (+4.91)#9,432
87. Rolla 17.3% 10.8% (+6.50)#87 12.5% (+4.72)#9,575
88. Anamoose 17.2% 10.8% (+6.48)#88 12.5% (+4.71)#9,586
89. Lisbon 17.0% 10.8% (+6.27)#89 12.5% (+4.50)#9,753
90. Tuttle 17.0% 10.8% (+6.22)#90 12.5% (+4.45)#9,803
91. Wishek 16.6% 10.8% (+5.87)#91 12.5% (+4.09)#10,086
92. Tappen 16.4% 10.8% (+5.67)#92 12.5% (+3.90)#10,263
93. Grand Forks 16.4% 10.8% (+5.65)#93 12.5% (+3.88)#10,279
94. Valley City 16.4% 10.8% (+5.62)#94 12.5% (+3.85)#10,309
95. Makoti 16.3% 10.8% (+5.52)#95 12.5% (+3.74)#10,407
96. Reeder 16.3% 10.8% (+5.52)#96 12.5% (+3.74)#10,408
97. Jud 16.3% 10.8% (+5.52)#97 12.5% (+3.74)#10,409
98. Hunter 16.3% 10.8% (+5.49)#98 12.5% (+3.72)#10,427
99. St John 15.7% 10.8% (+4.98)#99 12.5% (+3.21)#10,838
100. Gladstone 15.6% 10.8% (+4.86)#100 12.5% (+3.09)#10,943

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
72.7%
#4
63.6%
#5
61.2%
#6
55.6%
#7
54.7%
#8
54.5%
#9
52.2%
#10
47.4%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota?
Ypsilanti has the Highest Poverty Level in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level in North Dakota is 10.8%.
What is the Poverty Level in the United States?
Poverty Level in the United States is 12.5%.