Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama

City Poverty vs State vs National
1. Panola 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#1 12.5% (+87.5)#32
2. Megargel 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#2 12.5% (+87.5)#110
3. Abanda 86.6% 15.7% (+70.8)#3 12.5% (+74.0)#164
4. Mcmullen 76.5% 15.7% (+60.7)#4 12.5% (+63.9)#227
5. Yellow Bluff 63.8% 15.7% (+48.0)#5 12.5% (+51.2)#425
6. Putnam 62.3% 15.7% (+46.6)#6 12.5% (+49.8)#455
7. Delta 61.5% 15.7% (+45.8)#7 12.5% (+49.0)#477
8. Fruitdale 60.3% 15.7% (+44.6)#8 12.5% (+47.8)#505
9. Chunchula 58.6% 15.7% (+42.8)#9 12.5% (+46.0)#550
10. Uniontown 53.9% 15.7% (+38.2)#10 12.5% (+41.3)#708
11. Fredonia 52.6% 15.7% (+36.9)#11 12.5% (+40.1)#768
12. Union Springs 51.7% 15.7% (+36.0)#12 12.5% (+39.2)#815
13. Bon Air 50.9% 15.7% (+35.2)#13 12.5% (+38.4)#857
14. Vredenburgh 50.7% 15.7% (+35.0)#14 12.5% (+38.2)#872
15. Sanford 49.8% 15.7% (+34.1)#15 12.5% (+37.3)#924
16. Gainesville 49.3% 15.7% (+33.6)#16 12.5% (+36.7)#955
17. Uriah 47.6% 15.7% (+31.9)#17 12.5% (+35.1)#1,051
18. Aliceville 47.3% 15.7% (+31.6)#18 12.5% (+34.8)#1,070
19. Gantt 47.3% 15.7% (+31.6)#19 12.5% (+34.8)#1,072
20. Detroit 44.3% 15.7% (+28.6)#20 12.5% (+31.8)#1,303
21. Brent 44.3% 15.7% (+28.6)#21 12.5% (+31.8)#1,304
22. Brilliant 44.3% 15.7% (+28.5)#22 12.5% (+31.7)#1,307
23. Vinegar Bend 44.0% 15.7% (+28.3)#23 12.5% (+31.4)#1,325
24. Fort Deposit 43.8% 15.7% (+28.0)#24 12.5% (+31.2)#1,343
25. Mosses 43.3% 15.7% (+27.6)#25 12.5% (+30.8)#1,382
26. Clio 42.8% 15.7% (+27.1)#26 12.5% (+30.3)#1,439
27. Arley 42.6% 15.7% (+26.9)#27 12.5% (+30.1)#1,450
28. Ridgeville 42.6% 15.7% (+26.9)#28 12.5% (+30.0)#1,453
29. Camp Hill 41.3% 15.7% (+25.6)#29 12.5% (+28.7)#1,582
30. Riverview 40.6% 15.7% (+24.9)#30 12.5% (+28.1)#1,619
31. South Vinemont 40.6% 15.7% (+24.9)#31 12.5% (+28.0)#1,623
32. Livingston 40.3% 15.7% (+24.6)#32 12.5% (+27.8)#1,648
33. Belle Fontaine 39.5% 15.7% (+23.8)#33 12.5% (+27.0)#1,742
34. Memphis 39.1% 15.7% (+23.4)#34 12.5% (+26.6)#1,781
35. Ashland 38.7% 15.7% (+22.9)#35 12.5% (+26.1)#1,825
36. Atmore 38.2% 15.7% (+22.5)#36 12.5% (+25.7)#1,878
37. Brighton 37.8% 15.7% (+22.1)#37 12.5% (+25.3)#1,933
38. Pine Hill 37.4% 15.7% (+21.6)#38 12.5% (+24.8)#1,999
39. Whatley 37.2% 15.7% (+21.5)#39 12.5% (+24.7)#2,023
40. Hayneville 37.0% 15.7% (+21.3)#40 12.5% (+24.5)#2,062
41. Dutton 36.8% 15.7% (+21.1)#41 12.5% (+24.3)#2,088
42. Spruce Pine 36.7% 15.7% (+21.0)#42 12.5% (+24.2)#2,107
43. Ariton 36.6% 15.7% (+20.9)#43 12.5% (+24.1)#2,118
44. Boligee 36.2% 15.7% (+20.4)#44 12.5% (+23.6)#2,174
45. Lookout Mountain 36.1% 15.7% (+20.3)#45 12.5% (+23.5)#2,185
46. Trafford 35.8% 15.7% (+20.1)#46 12.5% (+23.3)#2,231
47. Samson 35.6% 15.7% (+19.9)#47 12.5% (+23.1)#2,261
48. Elmore 35.6% 15.7% (+19.9)#48 12.5% (+23.1)#2,263
49. Vincent 34.7% 15.7% (+19.0)#49 12.5% (+22.2)#2,397
50. Rutledge 34.6% 15.7% (+18.9)#50 12.5% (+22.1)#2,418
51. Lakeview 34.1% 15.7% (+18.3)#51 12.5% (+21.5)#2,517
52. White Hall 33.9% 15.7% (+18.1)#52 12.5% (+21.3)#2,557
53. Reform 33.7% 15.7% (+18.0)#53 12.5% (+21.2)#2,585
54. Fayette 33.6% 15.7% (+17.9)#54 12.5% (+21.1)#2,610
55. Goodwater 33.6% 15.7% (+17.9)#55 12.5% (+21.1)#2,612
56. Lisman 33.6% 15.7% (+17.8)#56 12.5% (+21.0)#2,622
57. Slocomb 33.3% 15.7% (+17.6)#57 12.5% (+20.7)#2,686
58. Greensboro 33.0% 15.7% (+17.3)#58 12.5% (+20.4)#2,740
59. Gaylesville 32.9% 15.7% (+17.2)#59 12.5% (+20.4)#2,748
60. Vina 32.9% 15.7% (+17.2)#60 12.5% (+20.4)#2,753
61. Cottonwood 32.3% 15.7% (+16.6)#61 12.5% (+19.8)#2,882
62. Lynn 32.0% 15.7% (+16.3)#62 12.5% (+19.5)#2,940
63. Bessemer 32.0% 15.7% (+16.3)#63 12.5% (+19.5)#2,941
64. Shorter 32.0% 15.7% (+16.3)#64 12.5% (+19.4)#2,961
65. Forkland 32.0% 15.7% (+16.2)#65 12.5% (+19.4)#2,966
66. Bellamy 31.9% 15.7% (+16.1)#66 12.5% (+19.3)#2,988
67. Tuskegee 31.7% 15.7% (+15.9)#67 12.5% (+19.1)#3,032
68. Chatom 31.7% 15.7% (+15.9)#68 12.5% (+19.1)#3,039
69. Prichard 31.6% 15.7% (+15.9)#69 12.5% (+19.1)#3,059
70. Double Springs 31.5% 15.7% (+15.8)#70 12.5% (+19.0)#3,072
71. Chickasaw 31.5% 15.7% (+15.8)#71 12.5% (+19.0)#3,079
72. Florala 31.1% 15.7% (+15.4)#72 12.5% (+18.5)#3,175
73. Flomaton 30.8% 15.7% (+15.0)#73 12.5% (+18.2)#3,234
74. Courtland 30.6% 15.7% (+14.8)#74 12.5% (+18.0)#3,288
75. Eunola 30.2% 15.7% (+14.5)#75 12.5% (+17.7)#3,359
76. Bridgeport 30.1% 15.7% (+14.3)#76 12.5% (+17.5)#3,397
77. Vernon 30.0% 15.7% (+14.3)#77 12.5% (+17.4)#3,411
78. Epes 29.9% 15.7% (+14.2)#78 12.5% (+17.3)#3,430
79. Broomtown 29.9% 15.7% (+14.1)#79 12.5% (+17.3)#3,436
80. Red Level 29.8% 15.7% (+14.1)#80 12.5% (+17.3)#3,441
81. Ragland 29.7% 15.7% (+14.0)#81 12.5% (+17.2)#3,466
82. Clayton 29.6% 15.7% (+13.9)#82 12.5% (+17.1)#3,494
83. Selma 29.5% 15.7% (+13.8)#83 12.5% (+17.0)#3,519
84. Vandiver 29.5% 15.7% (+13.8)#84 12.5% (+17.0)#3,527
85. Notasulga 29.4% 15.7% (+13.7)#85 12.5% (+16.9)#3,564
86. Steele 29.3% 15.7% (+13.6)#86 12.5% (+16.8)#3,584
87. Cedar Bluff 29.3% 15.7% (+13.6)#87 12.5% (+16.8)#3,587
88. Orrville 29.1% 15.7% (+13.4)#88 12.5% (+16.6)#3,637
89. York 29.0% 15.7% (+13.3)#89 12.5% (+16.5)#3,677
90. Castleberry 28.9% 15.7% (+13.2)#90 12.5% (+16.4)#3,695
91. Talladega 28.8% 15.7% (+13.1)#91 12.5% (+16.3)#3,713
92. Reeltown 28.8% 15.7% (+13.1)#92 12.5% (+16.3)#3,731
93. Collinsville 28.8% 15.7% (+13.0)#93 12.5% (+16.2)#3,737
94. Tarrant 28.6% 15.7% (+12.9)#94 12.5% (+16.1)#3,787
95. Waldo 28.6% 15.7% (+12.8)#95 12.5% (+16.0)#3,801
96. Munford 28.4% 15.7% (+12.7)#96 12.5% (+15.9)#3,857
97. Beaverton 28.3% 15.7% (+12.6)#97 12.5% (+15.8)#3,880
98. Wadley 28.3% 15.7% (+12.5)#98 12.5% (+15.7)#3,906
99. Brundidge 28.0% 15.7% (+12.3)#99 12.5% (+15.5)#3,964
100. Newville 28.0% 15.7% (+12.3)#100 12.5% (+15.5)#3,965

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
76.5%
#4
63.8%
#5
62.3%
#6
61.5%
#7
60.3%
#8
58.6%
#9
53.9%
#10
52.6%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama?
Panola has the Highest Poverty Level in Alabama with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level in the State of Alabama?
Poverty Level in Alabama is 15.7%.
What is the Poverty Level in the United States?
Poverty Level in the United States is 12.5%.