Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa

6.9%
33.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74126 33.0% 15.2% (+17.8)#26 12.5% (+20.5)#1,829
2. 74106 32.9% 15.2% (+17.7)#27 12.5% (+20.4)#1,840
3. 74110 32.9% 15.2% (+17.7)#28 12.5% (+20.4)#1,843
4. 74115 27.0% 15.2% (+11.8)#62 12.5% (+14.5)#3,053
5. 74130 26.6% 15.2% (+11.4)#70 12.5% (+14.1)#3,152
6. 74104 25.6% 15.2% (+10.4)#81 12.5% (+13.1)#3,435
7. 74146 25.3% 15.2% (+10.1)#86 12.5% (+12.8)#3,538
8. 74108 24.1% 15.2% (+8.85)#99 12.5% (+11.5)#3,995
9. 74129 22.8% 15.2% (+7.57)#115 12.5% (+10.3)#4,498
10. 74128 22.3% 15.2% (+7.08)#120 12.5% (+9.78)#4,731
11. 74107 22.2% 15.2% (+6.94)#126 12.5% (+9.63)#4,802
12. 74127 21.7% 15.2% (+6.48)#136 12.5% (+9.17)#5,030
13. 74103 21.7% 15.2% (+6.46)#137 12.5% (+9.15)#5,041
14. 74116 21.4% 15.2% (+6.22)#147 12.5% (+8.91)#5,193
15. 74136 19.5% 15.2% (+4.24)#198 12.5% (+6.93)#6,424
16. 74112 17.4% 15.2% (+2.13)#260 12.5% (+4.82)#8,106
17. 74119 17.3% 15.2% (+2.03)#263 12.5% (+4.73)#8,181
18. 74105 15.6% 15.2% (+0.386)#320 12.5% (+3.08)#9,769
19. 74145 12.7% 15.2% (-2.49)#417 12.5% (+0.205)#13,219
20. 74135 12.6% 15.2% (-2.61)#421 12.5% (+0.087)#13,394
21. 74131 12.3% 15.2% (-2.94)#438 12.5% (-0.250)#13,880
22. 74120 12.0% 15.2% (-3.24)#444 12.5% (-0.545)#14,298
23. 74134 11.1% 15.2% (-4.17)#468 12.5% (-1.48)#15,743
24. 74133 8.8% 15.2% (-6.42)#523 12.5% (-3.72)#19,472
25. 74114 8.0% 15.2% (-7.24)#543 12.5% (-4.54)#20,991
26. 74137 7.1% 15.2% (-8.09)#569 12.5% (-5.40)#22,609
27. 74132 6.9% 15.2% (-8.34)#574 12.5% (-5.64)#23,025

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
33.0%
#2
32.9%
#3
32.9%
#4
27.0%
#5
26.6%
#6
25.6%
#7
25.3%
#8
24.1%
#9
22.8%
#10
22.3%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
74126 has the Highest Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK with 33.0%.
What is the Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level in Tulsa is 18.2%.
What is the Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level in Oklahoma is 15.2%.
What is the Poverty Level in the United States?
Poverty Level in the United States is 12.5%.