Aleut Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Aleut
Select to Compare
Wage/Income Gap
Aleut Wage/Income Gap
23.7%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,745,679 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 23.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.28% in wage/income gap percentage.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Aleuts and wage/income gap percentage does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Aleuts influences an upward or downward trend in the level of wage/income gap percentage within an area, or if Aleuts simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of wage/income gap percentage due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Yakama (23.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Japanese (23.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Laos (23.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Sudan (23.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 99.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 23.5% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 99.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 23.6% |
| Hondurans | 99.5 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 23.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 99.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 23.6% |
| Kiowa | 99.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 23.6% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 99.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 23.6% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 99.2 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 23.7% |
| Aleuts | 99.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 23.7% |
| Yakama | 99.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 23.7% |
| Japanese | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 99.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Tsimshian | 98.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 23.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 98.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 24.0% |
| Moroccans | 98.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 24.0% |
| Sudanese | 98.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 24.0% |
Aleut Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut Data | Wage/Income Gap Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 83.8% | 83.0% |
| Range | 83.8% | 81.1% |
| Mean | 29.7% | 32.2% |
| Median | 20.2% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.6% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 51.0% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.3% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 18.6% |
Correlation Details
| Aleut Percentile | Sample Size | Wage/Income Gap |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 60,516,795 | 22.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 351,532 | 26.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 186,340 | 31.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 470,943 | 23.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 89,045 | 15.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.70% | 39,713 | 22.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 13,758 | 33.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 19,093 | 22.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 15,235 | 26.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 1,543 | 21.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 3,580 | 41.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61% | 10,351 | 23.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.98% | 401 | 64.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 12,618 | 6.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.43% | 1,822 | 6.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.16% | 4,680 | 33.4% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.32% | 383 | 31.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 836 | 21.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.91% | 92 | 41.4% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.65% | 452 | 33.0% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.80% | 237 | 6.5% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.47% | 235 | 30.6% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.19% | 108 | 60.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.69% | 2,344 | 1.9% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.71% | 2,216 | 38.9% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.56% | 54 | 25.3% |
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.00% | 60 | 83.0% |
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.58% | 310 | 31.9% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 115 | 31.0% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.90% | 206 | 11.4% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.43% | 126 | 71.9% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.56% | 144 | 45.8% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.18% | 170 | 53.3% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.80% | 142 | 55.2% |