Aleut Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Aleut
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Aleut Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
16.9%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
28.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,541,696 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 16.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.33% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Aleuts and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Aleuts influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Aleuts simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
| Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
| Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
| Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Aleut Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 6.6% |
| Maximum | 96.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.4% | 93.4% |
| Mean | 36.8% | 27.1% |
| Median | 21.1% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.6% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 69.4% | 21.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.8% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.2% | 22.2% |
Correlation Details
| Aleut Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 60,339,025 | 19.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 336,918 | 16.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 185,438 | 13.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 472,901 | 13.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 82,560 | 10.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 45,374 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 10,232 | 14.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 15,501 | 25.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 12,620 | 24.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 2,879 | 9.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 964 | 15.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 90 | 55.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61% | 10,351 | 18.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 12,618 | 6.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.43% | 1,822 | 11.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.16% | 4,680 | 11.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 836 | 17.1% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.47% | 235 | 14.0% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.19% | 108 | 50.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.70% | 2,096 | 22.0% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.71% | 2,216 | 6.8% |
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.58% | 310 | 50.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 115 | 10.7% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.43% | 126 | 42.9% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.58% | 95 | 25.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.56% | 90 | 25.0% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.08% | 698 | 17.4% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.23% | 172 | 24.1% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.56% | 144 | 50.0% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.18% | 170 | 58.3% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.80% | 142 | 85.7% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.23% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.43% | 56 | 12.5% |