Aleut Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Aleut Single Female Poverty
25.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 25.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.28% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Aleuts and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Aleuts influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Aleuts simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Aleut Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 85.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 85.0% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 32.8% | 37.3% |
| Median | 14.4% | 29.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.1% | 45.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 66.0% | 22.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.8% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 22.8% |
Correlation Details
| Aleut Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 60,346,864 | 23.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 326,789 | 24.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 171,087 | 23.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 462,682 | 19.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 83,470 | 21.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 47,081 | 25.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 14,213 | 21.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 15,501 | 23.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 12,620 | 28.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.65% | 2,777 | 24.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 964 | 28.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 90 | 62.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61% | 10,351 | 10.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 12,618 | 32.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.43% | 1,822 | 48.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 226 | 33.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.16% | 4,680 | 42.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 836 | 7.7% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.47% | 235 | 31.4% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.19% | 108 | 100.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.70% | 2,096 | 16.7% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.71% | 2,216 | 75.0% |
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.58% | 310 | 81.2% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 115 | 38.1% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.58% | 95 | 33.3% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.56% | 90 | 33.3% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.08% | 698 | 20.0% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.23% | 172 | 33.3% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.56% | 144 | 66.7% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.18% | 170 | 50.0% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.80% | 142 | 91.7% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.00% | 80 | 22.2% |