Immigrants from Chile Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Select to Compare
Wage/Income Gap
Immigrants from Chile Wage/Income Gap
25.7%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,595,517 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250 and weighted average of 25.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.99% in wage/income gap percentage.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Chile and wage/income gap percentage does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Chile influences an upward or downward trend in the level of wage/income gap percentage within an area, or if Immigrants from Chile simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of wage/income gap percentage due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Belarus (25.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (25.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Greece (25.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Oceania (25.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Sri Lankan (25.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants from Hong Kong | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 25.5% |
Immigrants from Ukraine | 63.8 /100 | #166 | Good 25.5% |
Paiute | 62.9 /100 | #167 | Good 25.5% |
Seminole | 62.6 /100 | #168 | Good 25.6% |
Peruvians | 60.1 /100 | #169 | Good 25.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 57.5 /100 | #170 | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from Greece | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 25.7% |
Immigrants from Chile | 53.2 /100 | #172 | Average 25.7% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 52.9 /100 | #173 | Average 25.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 25.8% |
Sri Lankans | 47.0 /100 | #175 | Average 25.8% |
Paraguayans | 46.7 /100 | #176 | Average 25.8% |
Cambodians | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 25.8% |
Chinese | 42.0 /100 | #178 | Average 25.9% |
Samoans | 38.6 /100 | #179 | Fair 26.0% |
Immigrants from Chile Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile Data | Wage/Income Gap Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 12.1% | 52.4% |
Range | 12.1% | 48.9% |
Mean | 3.3% | 29.5% |
Median | 2.5% | 30.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 34.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 11.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Chile Percentile | Sample Size | Wage/Income Gap |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 197,861,394 | 24.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 13,496,475 | 26.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 4,071,569 | 26.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 1,427,595 | 24.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 652,766 | 30.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 552,573 | 32.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 211,173 | 31.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 56,976 | 44.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 60,464 | 27.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 52,047 | 34.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 47,435 | 29.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 17,412 | 38.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 27,331 | 35.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 9,938 | 32.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 20,971 | 26.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 5,128 | 32.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 2,826 | 17.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 285 | 17.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.81% | 187 | 30.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 8,450 | 3.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.75% | 7,307 | 3.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 1,904 | 36.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 732 | 32.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,622 | 48.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.12% | 957 | 52.4% |