Chickasaw vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,190,592 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.278% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 278.1 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,321, a difference of 21.3%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $33,009, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $83,932, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $76,226, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,225, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 63.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 57.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 150.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 86.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (64.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 74.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 39.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 109.7%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 74.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.9%).